Beijing Measures on Accelerating Agentic AI Development

ACTIVE
China · BeijingIndustry Promotion

China's first provincial-level policy specifically targeting AI agents. Covers five major areas: foundational technology R&D, industrial deployment, super-individual (OPC) entrepreneurship, token economics, and security governance. Maximum single-project support up to ¥100M. First to propose Agent Interconnection Protocol (AIP) and "model-governs-model" safety philosophy.

Key Provisions

  • Promote Agentic AI innovation: ultra-long-horizon tasks, complex reasoning, multi-agent collaboration
  • Support "Token Factories" — explore token vouchers and agent service vouchers as new compute subsidies
  • Establish tiered and classified agent regulation, build agent safety service platform and trusted sandbox
Read Official Document →

EU AI Act — Regulation (EU) 2024/1689

ACTIVE
European UnionRegulation

The world's first comprehensive AI legislation. Adopts a risk-tiered framework, classifying autonomous agent systems as high-risk and requiring mandatory risk assessments, transparency disclosures, and human oversight. Fully enforceable from August 12, 2026.

Key Provisions

  • High-risk AI systems must complete conformity assessments, maintain technical documentation, logging, and human oversight
  • Autonomous AI systems in critical infrastructure, hiring, or law enforcement are automatically classified as high-risk
  • Penalties up to 7% of global annual turnover or €35M
Read Official Document →

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)

ACTIVE
United StatesFramework

Framework published by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology, providing voluntary guidance on AI risk management through four core functions: Govern, Map, Measure, Manage. In July 2024, a generative AI extension (NIST AI 600-1) was released.

Key Provisions

  • Four core functions: Govern → Map (identify risks) → Measure (assess risks) → Manage (mitigate risks)
  • Emphasizes fundamental differences between AI risk and traditional software risk: emergent behavior, sociotechnical coupling, unpredictability
  • April 2026: released concept paper on AI Risk Management Profile for Critical Infrastructure
Read Official Document →

UK AI Regulation — A Pro-Innovation Approach

ACTIVE
United KingdomPolicy Framework

The UK takes a "pro-innovation" path — no horizontal omnibus legislation. Instead, five cross-sector principles are enforced by existing regulators within their respective mandates. The AI Safety Institute is the world's first national-level AI safety research body.

Key Provisions

  • Five principles: safe & robust, transparent & explainable, fair, accountable & well-governed, contestable & redressable
  • AI Safety Institute funded with over £100M, focused on evaluating frontier AI system safety
  • Central coordination function established to ensure cross-regulator AI governance consistency
Read Official Document →

IMDA Model AI Governance Framework for Agentic AI

ACTIVE
SingaporeGovernance Framework

The world's first governance framework specifically targeting autonomous AI agents, released at the World Economic Forum in Davos. Identifies five agent-specific risks (misfeasance, overreach, cascading failures, data leakage, bias amplification) across four governance dimensions.

Key Provisions

  • Four governance dimensions: risk assessment & boundary setting, meaningful human accountability, technical controls & processes, end-user responsibility
  • Explicitly addresses multi-agent systemic risks: Agent Sprawl, coordination failures (misalignment / conflict / collusion), unpredictable emergent behavior
  • Requires structured controls (least-privilege permissions, sandbox isolation, tool-call audit logs) — not just prompt-layer safeguards
Read Official Document →